Minutes Approved 5/20/2009
Microsoft Word Version (original)
Marsha Christy, Jeff Tomlinson, Lecia Eubanks, Donna Howell, Thomas Jones, Nancy Tillingast, Lisa Rigsby, Richard Sanders, Claudia Gibson.
GPLS, PINES and Equinox staff, PINES library directors and staff members.
Marsha Christy called the meeting to order.
Marsha welcomed everyone and thanked them for attending. She thanked Joe Shinnick for service and wished him well in his retirement. She also welcomed Jeff Tomlinson, appointed by Executive Committee as Joe’s replacement.
The minutes were distributed. Gibson made and Jones seconded a motion to approve them as distributed. Motion carried.
These minutes will be on the agenda for approval at the next annual meeting.
The minutes were distributed. Eubanks made and Gibson seconded motion to approve them as distributed. Motion carried.
A. Staff Update: Dawn Dale, began October 1, responsible for PINES helpdesk. She has been cleaning out helpdesk backlog. Emily Arnold. Time Daniels, now Assistant State Librarian, will continue to work on some PINES issues and heads up courier service workgroup for all libraries. GPLS is looking at needs within PINES team to see what new staff positions are needed. Usability and training are known needs, but currently all hiring for state-paid positions frozen. Dr. Veatch is asking for exemption to fill that position.
B. Emily - Director’s Survey, software development, working groups, site visits, communications
C. Chris - Site Architecture, Testing Cluster, Vandelay
D. Dawn Dale – Helpdesk and P/P Manual
E. Elaine Hardy – Acquisitions and Cataloging Report
The PINES staff is proposing an expanded committee/workgroup, working with acquisitions, cataloging, and other related issues - including policy issues that may need to be addressed and non-financial transactions. Their first meeting will be in December and is open to anyone interested. Elaine manages database quality. As discussed in hold meeting, the database needs cleanup. The problem is there is no money and limited time and personnel. De-duping and merging records is helping – usually eliminates half the records in PINES when records are cleaned up. An intern is working to clean-up and enhance records. Our database and PINES are only as good as our cataloging quality! Updates to OCLC holdings are being done so we are compliant. Batch loading of Overdrive records will take place soon. SOLINET and PALINET are planning to merge and some changes will be made. OCLC policies are changing as well. Should not impact us, but we will have to see.
D. Delivery Service
Elizabeth reported that two vendors have passed technical part of contract and their financials are being checked by OPB now. Currently STAT is compliant with contract on turnaround time! Please let PINES staff know if there are problems getting items in timely way.
E. Training
F. Statistical Reports
Katherine gave rundown of number of training sessions provided and a handout of overdue materials and intra-PINES loans by system. The breakdown by facility will be online and should continue to be available online quarterly.
Elizabeth said they are working with Indiana to see about setting up a new user interface for reports to make functionality better, more user-friendly.
Elizabeth also reported that the “Preminders” – e-mail notices sent to patrons when books are about to be due to give them a chance to renew or return on time- were in the works. This is seen as a good communication tool and good PR. It also provides another good reason to update patron e-mail addresses and helps prevent needless overdue notices. Elizabeth says that so far PINES has spent over $276,000 on overdue notices this year. This will help with cutting costs, and without it we may lose other state funding to continue.
Karen Schneider, Community Librarian, hopes that communication is improving between libraries and Equinox. They have been making site visits and found reports interface was universally disliked. Documentation is not strong for PINES right now. Currently they have four contractors working on documentation and got a $50,000 grant to help with that. They are working with PINES on getting issues out on PINES list from Equinox. New releases have been installed, and more updates coming with release candidates to be sent to workgroups for testing. Release 1. 4 should have self-check product not requiring SIP2, making it low-cost, Acquisitions (no more development for a time), serials & reserves included in next major release, 2. 0 in May 2009. New Evergreen newsletter is now available for wider Evergreen activities. Better communication between PINES and Equinox and member libraries and appears to be helping. Gave algorithm for how metarecords are provided. Equinox will send out update giving information on upcoming releases. The Canadian academic libraries, Operation Conifer, are coming online early 2009.
A. AI1, Proposal to establish “Payment Plan” Patron Profile
Rigsby made, and Tomlinson seconded a motion to accept subcommittee recommendation to approve this profile. Motion carried.
B. AI2. Definition of patron inactivity
As part of this, Katherine recommended that all libraries really work on adding county information into patron records – this did not transfer from SIRSI and makes it difficult to give information/stated that are requested by libraries/reports.
Two parts of this, what constitutes activity, and who should delete patron information and when.
First, Rigsby made a motion to accept GPLS/PINES staff recommendation (from handout) for definition of activity, Gibson seconded. Motion carried.
Next, Elizabeth says that PINES staff strongly discouraged mass deletions because it removed other data. Reports on patrons can be run to see which patrons are inactive. The recommendation is that the records be marked inactive after three years of no activity instead of deleting them. Recommendation is that somewhere in the patron record indicate that it was system deactivation. While there are some valid reasons for deleting patron records – duplications, death of patron, etc. , doing so may result in lost data. Rigsby moved that patron cards be marked as inactive after three years of no activity. Tomlinson seconded. Brief discussion on how these will be reported by default on patron count reports. The committee asked that PINES staff let libraries know when this goes into effect.
Katherine says that there has been no purge/change in patron database since 2006, so the next one will be large. Development activity is required before this can go into effect. Questions about how the large number of records impacts search time. The committee requested that this issue be referred back to sub-committee to discuss the issues of deleting patron records to be sure there is a reasoned process in deciding when deletion is appropriate.
C. Proposal not to charge out of state patrons in Barbour County, AL
Quitman County recently changed library systems and joined PINES. There was a long-term agreement between this county and Barbour County, Alabama for reciprocal library use.
Proposal one was that no out of state fee be charged. Howell moved and Gibson seconded a motion to accept the subcommittee recommendation not to waive the out-of-state fee. Motion carries with one opposed, Richard Sanders.
Proposal two was to allow a grace period for existing card holders before charging the out of state fee. Gibson moved and Rigsby seconded a motion to give a grace period for these Barbour County, AL out of state users until their current PINES card expires. Motion carried.
D. PINES Acquisitions Subcommittee Nominations
Because of timing, there is a need for a list of subcommittee nominees to be approved to work as subcommittee members until their formal approval at the annual meeting. Tillingast moved, and Gibson seconded a motion to approve this list pending approval of library directors of staff members on the list, to have these folks act in their subcommittee capacity until officially approved at annual meeting. Motion carried.
Gibson asked about status of routing information printing on holds slips. Elizabeth says it is on the list, but not yet available. Also, asked about whether bubble wrap is required. According to PINES policy it is. Gibson moved that wording for policy as regards to wrapping items for shipment be changed by eliminating the words “in bubble wrap” from the policy. The new policy should read “Items should be appropriately packaged to protect them from damage while in transit. ” Tomlinson seconded. Motion carried.
Jones made and Gibson seconded a motion to adjourn. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Donna W. Howell, Secretary
PINES Executive Committee