cat:outsourcing
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
cat:outsourcing [2018/09/27 20:05] – ehardy | cat:outsourcing [2018/09/27 20:11] – ehardy | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
FOR PINES MEMBER LIBRARY SYSTEMS | FOR PINES MEMBER LIBRARY SYSTEMS | ||
- | If a PINES member library system wishes to investigate the possibility of outsourcing | + | If a PINES member library system wishes to investigate the possibility of outsourcing |
- | - A PINES member | + | - A member |
- | - The director and the primary | + | - The director and the primary |
- | - All outsourcing vendor will be expected to adhere to the same Cataloging Standards that are required from any CAT1 user. | + | - All outsourcing vendor will be expected to adhere to the same Cataloging Standards that are required from any Cat1 user. |
- | - All outsourcing vendor will be expected to add only Full MARC records to the PINES database, as is required from any CAT1 user. This includes upgrading any CIP (Cataloging-in-Process) records before adding these records to the PINES database. | + | - All outsourcing vendor will be expected to add only Full MARC records to the PINES database, as is required from any Cat1 user. This includes upgrading any CIP (Cataloging-in-Process) records before adding these records to the PINES database. |
- Batch-loading of bibliographic records into the PINES database is not an option for either current CAT1 users or outsourcing vendors, as this may result in the duplication of bibliographic records; this is in direct conflict with one of the stated goals of PINES to create and maintain a union catalog. | - Batch-loading of bibliographic records into the PINES database is not an option for either current CAT1 users or outsourcing vendors, as this may result in the duplication of bibliographic records; this is in direct conflict with one of the stated goals of PINES to create and maintain a union catalog. | ||
- Cataloging Profiles, usually requested by a vendor in order to define specifications, | - Cataloging Profiles, usually requested by a vendor in order to define specifications, | ||
- Prospective vendors must agree to hold GPLS and OCLC harmless for access and access time to the PINES and OCLC databases. | - Prospective vendors must agree to hold GPLS and OCLC harmless for access and access time to the PINES and OCLC databases. | ||
- | - The PINES Cataloging Specialist should monitor the Cataloging Standards of the vendors who receive | + | - The PINES Cataloging Specialist should monitor the Cataloging Standards of the vendors who receive |
- The PINES Cataloging Specialist should determine what constitutes a Full MARC record and will, as part of a continuing monitoring process identify the most reliable/ | - The PINES Cataloging Specialist should determine what constitutes a Full MARC record and will, as part of a continuing monitoring process identify the most reliable/ | ||