cat:pines_local_rda_guidelines
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| cat:pines_local_rda_guidelines [2018/03/28 18:36] – ehardy | cat:pines_local_rda_guidelines [2019/04/11 15:30] (current) – [PINES local RDA Guidelines for Core Elements in Original Cataloging] ehardy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | **PINES local RDA Guidelines for Core Elements in Original Cataloging** | + | ====== |
| Since RDA provides options in certain areas of descriptive cataloging, the PINES Cataloging Sub-committee has approved the following practices as PINES local guidelines. Decisions on options are subject to change as best practices continue to emerge. If there is a conflict between a RDA rule and a LC-PCC-PS, we generally follow the latter’s practice. | Since RDA provides options in certain areas of descriptive cataloging, the PINES Cataloging Sub-committee has approved the following practices as PINES local guidelines. Decisions on options are subject to change as best practices continue to emerge. If there is a conflict between a RDA rule and a LC-PCC-PS, we generally follow the latter’s practice. | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| Under normal circumstanced, | Under normal circumstanced, | ||
| - | **245 SOR, more than three creators (LC-PCC PS 2.4.1.5)** | + | **245 Statement of Responsibility (SOR), more than three creators (LC-PCC PS 2.4.1.5)** |
| Follow LC Policy Statement 2.4.1.5 Option: LC practice for Optional omission: **Generally do not omit names in a statement of responsibility**. (see [[https:// | Follow LC Policy Statement 2.4.1.5 Option: LC practice for Optional omission: **Generally do not omit names in a statement of responsibility**. (see [[https:// | ||
cat/pines_local_rda_guidelines.1522262190.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/10/11 20:15 (external edit)